Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Silence is not a Transgendered Person

Since it's inevitable that the topic of gender with come up in "Silence", I want to say that I don't think the poem can relate to contemporary theories of transgenderism or queerness. "Silence" might seem conducive to such topics, but the text does not lend itself to such a reading. It is clear that Silence is being raised as a boy due to King Evan's law which states only sons may inherit. A lengthy passage assures us that Nature spared nothing to make Silence the most beautiful girl possible. Her biological gender is never in dispute - no ambiguous genitalia or hermaphroditic characteristics. She is without a doubt female. The fact that her parents take so many precautions to hide her from society attests to this. Silence is also well aware that she is a girl and understands why she must act and appear as a boy. It is not as though she fells like a boy trapped in a girl's body and wants her physical gender to match her emotional/psychological gender. Neither is her situation permanent. She only need perform as a boy until she comes into her inheritance or until her parents have a son. This all stands in contrast to the modern conceptions of transgenderism, where a person seeks to identify with or become another gender. Silence is a tale more similar to several Shakespeare plays where a character must perform as the opposite sex to achieve an end, but steps out of that role once the end is achieved. This is also similar to the plot of "Mrs. Doubtfire", where Robin Williams' character must act like an woman to be with his children. He does not surgically want to be transformed into a woman anymore than Silence wants to be. Both are disguising themselves for a purpose, and once that purpose is accomplished, the disguise is removed. They are not transgendered people, they are actors trying to survive.

3 comments:

  1. Kurt, that's a good point, though Silence actually (and sadly) reminded me even more of the girls in Afghanistan who are being raised as boys by parents who want them to enjoy a little more freedom (presumably before puberty strikes). Your point about not imposing modern ideas of transgender stands, though I would caution you from conflating transgendered with transsexual, since (as we talked about in Queer Theory), they are actually two different categories.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rose, I avoided using the word transsexual because my understanding is this word denotes a person who emotionally/psychologically believes they belong to the opposite sex. A transgendered person, however, is indentified with a gender other than their biological one. This is the distinction the OED makes, which is why I referred to Silence as transgendered and not transsexual. Of course, my understanding of queer theory is very limited, so I may be wrong about this.

    I am glad you mentioned puberty, because the author of "Silence" seems to ignore it. By my reckoning, Silence is 16 or 17 by the time she leaves the minstrels, yet puberty seems not to have changed her.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting you mention puberty - I wonder how you interpret lines 2500-2501: "In her twelfth year, Nature appeared,/ grumbling and complaining and blaming her." I understand that, on one level, it is the physical manifestation of Nature that appears before Silence, admonishing her for conducting herself like a man, but I wonder if, on another level, this is also a subtle hint at puberty? If so, the appearance of puberty, then, almost convinces Silence to reveal her true "nature" until Reason comes and convinces her otherwise - a moment interestingly when Reason and Nature clash.

    ReplyDelete